Bill Ryan is claiming that Charles has told him that he (Bill) is a descendent of the bloodline of King Arthur. Along with Charles (ex football hooligan) 18 recruits they are to take on some of the rather unpleasant 33 people who rule the planet Earth, together they are setting up the new Knights of the Round Table. (im uncertain as to whether or not Bill believes this claim to be the case)
Can this really be the case. I posted this in the meanwhile thread but perhaps it deserves its own spot so I will repost some stuff here. Any thoughts?
The first one relates to a website that sees the reinstitution of King Arthur and his 18 Knights as the herald of the Anti Christ and the New World Order.
It says on this website that King Arthur is the anti christ..at lesast the returning incarnation of him.
So in that case. Charlie Farlie is grooming Bill Ryan (whom Charlie says is King Arthur) to be the anti christ aswell as choosing 18 Knights to sit around their round table so they can talk XXXX about how deluded they are all day.
Is anybody good at writing scripts as we could turn this into an excellent comedy sketch.
http://www.grailcode.net/
When this celestial Round Table manifests on earth, it will be chaired by a Merovingian descendant of King Arthur who was the fabled Guardian of the Grail during his particular era of history. Another New Age book titled 'The Light Shall Set You Free' recalling 'King Arthur's olde mandate' at Glastonbury Avalon confirms that England will be the future center for world Transformation. It will be through 'the Grail in England' that the energies of transformation and ascension will be channeled, which eventually will bring the Earth into the Seventh Golden Age
posted by Andromeda
One thing I wanted to say seriously is that the bloodline of King Arthur can not be tracked because no one knows in England whether he was real or a fantasy. Many have speculated that there were several King Arthurs and so how can anyone track the bloodline of someone who remains a myth?
Should King Arthur really existed Camelot and his palace and all the trimmings will be the biggest touristic attraction in the UK. Such thing does not exist for real nor Tintagel have been proven to be related in any way to King Arthur either
It is all because the book According to Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain but not a shred of archeological evidence has ever existed to this date to my best understanding http://www.britannia.com/history/h12.html
I am not a historian but most historians will agree that there is no evidence of Camelot and King Arthur at least the way its being conceived by public imagination and the movie industry
Therefore Bill can not possibly be a descendant of Arthur
I am seriously wondering if AV2 have already ascended to the realm of the ridiculous
Posted by Floyd
There is reference to Arthur in welsh mythology as well as other celtic legend. This has been documented among others by Caradoc of LLancarfan who as a monk historian weaved in the history of mythology and legend with the history of the Britons and the Saxons.
It is likley that Arthur and his Welsh equivalent are archetypes, allegorical figures that didnt actually exist as themselves but came down through history as an amalgamation of fact, fiction myth and Legend. For this reason alone it is 99% certain there is no bloodline for King Arthur which makes Charles' claims (as usual incorrect and Bill, if he believes it, living in a fairy tale.)
Andromeda, I reccommend N R Manns excellent 'The isle of Avalon' in relation to all things Glastonbury, Avalon and the Tor. Very well researched.
Can this really be the case. I posted this in the meanwhile thread but perhaps it deserves its own spot so I will repost some stuff here. Any thoughts?
The first one relates to a website that sees the reinstitution of King Arthur and his 18 Knights as the herald of the Anti Christ and the New World Order.
It says on this website that King Arthur is the anti christ..at lesast the returning incarnation of him.
So in that case. Charlie Farlie is grooming Bill Ryan (whom Charlie says is King Arthur) to be the anti christ aswell as choosing 18 Knights to sit around their round table so they can talk XXXX about how deluded they are all day.
Is anybody good at writing scripts as we could turn this into an excellent comedy sketch.
http://www.grailcode.net/
When this celestial Round Table manifests on earth, it will be chaired by a Merovingian descendant of King Arthur who was the fabled Guardian of the Grail during his particular era of history. Another New Age book titled 'The Light Shall Set You Free' recalling 'King Arthur's olde mandate' at Glastonbury Avalon confirms that England will be the future center for world Transformation. It will be through 'the Grail in England' that the energies of transformation and ascension will be channeled, which eventually will bring the Earth into the Seventh Golden Age
posted by Andromeda
One thing I wanted to say seriously is that the bloodline of King Arthur can not be tracked because no one knows in England whether he was real or a fantasy. Many have speculated that there were several King Arthurs and so how can anyone track the bloodline of someone who remains a myth?
Should King Arthur really existed Camelot and his palace and all the trimmings will be the biggest touristic attraction in the UK. Such thing does not exist for real nor Tintagel have been proven to be related in any way to King Arthur either
It is all because the book According to Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain but not a shred of archeological evidence has ever existed to this date to my best understanding http://www.britannia.com/history/h12.html
I am not a historian but most historians will agree that there is no evidence of Camelot and King Arthur at least the way its being conceived by public imagination and the movie industry
Therefore Bill can not possibly be a descendant of Arthur
I am seriously wondering if AV2 have already ascended to the realm of the ridiculous
Posted by Floyd
There is reference to Arthur in welsh mythology as well as other celtic legend. This has been documented among others by Caradoc of LLancarfan who as a monk historian weaved in the history of mythology and legend with the history of the Britons and the Saxons.
It is likley that Arthur and his Welsh equivalent are archetypes, allegorical figures that didnt actually exist as themselves but came down through history as an amalgamation of fact, fiction myth and Legend. For this reason alone it is 99% certain there is no bloodline for King Arthur which makes Charles' claims (as usual incorrect and Bill, if he believes it, living in a fairy tale.)
Andromeda, I reccommend N R Manns excellent 'The isle of Avalon' in relation to all things Glastonbury, Avalon and the Tor. Very well researched.
ok well, not really but I always liked him 
that misplaced her spaceship 
