+3
B.B.Baghor
orthodoxymoron
bobhardee
7 posters
Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°27
Re: Fukushima revisited
5/4/2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHT55BfsMt0
This is such an incredibility sad story and its not over and not being reported.
):
Bob H.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHT55BfsMt0
This is such an incredibility sad story and its not over and not being reported.
God Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
The courage to changes the things I can change
And the wisdom to know the difference.
The courage to changes the things I can change
And the wisdom to know the difference.
):
Bob H.
B.B.Baghor- Posts : 1851
Join date : 2014-01-31
Age : 73
Location : Druid county UK
- Post n°28
Re: Fukushima revisited
I'm merely expressing my intention and the choice of my path, bobhardee, no hard feelings whatsoever.
I'm not in the Mists anymore, I hoped I had made that clear in my former message here. Read my last post
in the works of art thread of mine. Be well and farewell to you all.
I'm not in the Mists anymore, I hoped I had made that clear in my former message here. Read my last post
in the works of art thread of mine. Be well and farewell to you all.
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°29
Re: Fukushima revisited
5/6/2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_r_ibE7jYU
This disaster is not easy to accept. It is very sad. It is hard to believe that the people of the world are not being told the truth....and the evidence as indicated from all of the videos posted above strongly suggest that everything living on planet earth is in serious trouble.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_r_ibE7jYU
This disaster is not easy to accept. It is very sad. It is hard to believe that the people of the world are not being told the truth....and the evidence as indicated from all of the videos posted above strongly suggest that everything living on planet earth is in serious trouble.
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°30
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°31
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°32
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°33
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°34
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°35
Re: Fukushima revisited
6/21/2016
This is the only network piece I can find on Fukushima. It's all pictures. No reporting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCLoskDk-2Y
This is the only network piece I can find on Fukushima. It's all pictures. No reporting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCLoskDk-2Y
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°36
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°37
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°38
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°39
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°40
Re: Fukushima revisited
9/18/16 This is not good. We all knew it was bad but not this bad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbP7JMQtXp8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbP7JMQtXp8
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°41
Re: Fukushima revisited
9/21/2016
This will increase your pucker factor ten fold. It is about the impact of radiation from Fukushima on the airline industry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqeYluqP2C0
This will increase your pucker factor ten fold. It is about the impact of radiation from Fukushima on the airline industry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqeYluqP2C0
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°42
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°43
Re: Fukushima revisited
bobhardee- Posts : 3445
Join date : 2012-09-08
Age : 74
Location : The Sandhills of SC
- Post n°44
Re: Fukushima revisited
Jenetta- Posts : 1978
Join date : 2010-04-16
Location : British Columbia Canada
- Post n°45
Fukushima Revisited
Obama Fired Key Scientist On The Deadly Cumulative Affects Of Low Dose Rad Exposure
A Congressional investigation reveals the Obama administration covered up federal radiation research so the administration could push climate change agenda.
What are the long term consequences of repeated low doses of radiation for example from medical imaging devices or nuclear fallout from disasters such as Fukushima, Three Mile Island or Chernobyl?
What about the fallout from a nuclear dirty bomb denoted by a terrorist?
What should the evacuation zones be and what are safe limits for long-term exposure to such low doses of radiation?
Answers to these questions are exactly what the Low Dose Radiation Research Program, or LDRRP, seeks to answer.
But a newly released congressional investigation into misconduct surrounding the program reveals the Obama administration sought to shut the program down by firing a top scientist and intimidating other scientists so Obama could push his climate agenda.
Currently nuclear power is the only current form of energy able to mass compete with energy produced by carbon based fuels and damaging information about the long-term consequences of low doses of radiation makes the climate agenda hard to push.
To stop key information about the impact of radiation from being made public the Obama administration tried to censor work from a top scientist in the program, Dr. Noelle Metting, and retaliated by firing her after she refused to limit testimony to Congress to Department of Energy talking points.
“The committee has learned that one of DoE’s stated purposes for Dr. Metting’s removal from federal service was her failure to confine the discussion at the briefing to pre-approved talking points,” according to the report. “The committee has also established that DoE management … failed to exercise even a minimal standard of care to avoid chilling other agency scientists as a result of the retaliation against Dr. Metting for her refusal to censor information from Congress.”
The investigation concluded that “DoE placed its own priorities to further the president’s Climate Action Plan before its constitutional obligations to be candid with Congress,” the report states. “The DoE’s actions constitute a reckless and calculated attack on the legislative process itself, which undermines the power of Congress to legislate. The committee further concludes that DoE’s disregard for separation of powers is not limited to a small group of employees, but rather is an institutional problem that must be corrected by overhauling its management practices with respect to its relationship with the Congress.”
According to the investigation, the full text of which follows below, other scientists were also intimated about their research by the Obama administration which sought to divert funds for the program to push the climate agenda.
http://alexanderhiggins.com/obama-fired-key-scientist-on-the-deadly-cumulative-affects-of-low-dose-rad-exposure/
__________________________________
As it is below; so it is above
A Congressional investigation reveals the Obama administration covered up federal radiation research so the administration could push climate change agenda.
What are the long term consequences of repeated low doses of radiation for example from medical imaging devices or nuclear fallout from disasters such as Fukushima, Three Mile Island or Chernobyl?
What about the fallout from a nuclear dirty bomb denoted by a terrorist?
What should the evacuation zones be and what are safe limits for long-term exposure to such low doses of radiation?
Answers to these questions are exactly what the Low Dose Radiation Research Program, or LDRRP, seeks to answer.
But a newly released congressional investigation into misconduct surrounding the program reveals the Obama administration sought to shut the program down by firing a top scientist and intimidating other scientists so Obama could push his climate agenda.
Currently nuclear power is the only current form of energy able to mass compete with energy produced by carbon based fuels and damaging information about the long-term consequences of low doses of radiation makes the climate agenda hard to push.
To stop key information about the impact of radiation from being made public the Obama administration tried to censor work from a top scientist in the program, Dr. Noelle Metting, and retaliated by firing her after she refused to limit testimony to Congress to Department of Energy talking points.
“The committee has learned that one of DoE’s stated purposes for Dr. Metting’s removal from federal service was her failure to confine the discussion at the briefing to pre-approved talking points,” according to the report. “The committee has also established that DoE management … failed to exercise even a minimal standard of care to avoid chilling other agency scientists as a result of the retaliation against Dr. Metting for her refusal to censor information from Congress.”
The investigation concluded that “DoE placed its own priorities to further the president’s Climate Action Plan before its constitutional obligations to be candid with Congress,” the report states. “The DoE’s actions constitute a reckless and calculated attack on the legislative process itself, which undermines the power of Congress to legislate. The committee further concludes that DoE’s disregard for separation of powers is not limited to a small group of employees, but rather is an institutional problem that must be corrected by overhauling its management practices with respect to its relationship with the Congress.”
According to the investigation, the full text of which follows below, other scientists were also intimated about their research by the Obama administration which sought to divert funds for the program to push the climate agenda.
http://alexanderhiggins.com/obama-fired-key-scientist-on-the-deadly-cumulative-affects-of-low-dose-rad-exposure/
__________________________________
As it is below; so it is above
Carol- Admin
- Posts : 31775
Join date : 2010-04-07
Location : Hawaii
- Post n°46
Re: Fukushima revisited
Typical Obama MOA. 28 more days and he's out the door for good.
_________________
What is life?
It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.
With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol
mudra- Posts : 23223
Join date : 2010-04-09
Age : 69
Location : belgium
- Post n°48
Re: Fukushima revisited
burgundia wrote:
Another 9/11 " mystery " to be solved .
Love from me
mudra